Thinking of buying a new computer
#1
Posted 01 July 2007 - 09:12 AM
PROSESSOR Intel® Core™ 2 Duo E6600-prosessor (2,4 GHz, 1066 MHz, 4 MB buffer)
OPERATIVSYSTEM Real Windows® XP Media Center Edition 2005 - English
MEMORY 4096 MB 667 MHz Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM [4 x 1024]
HARDDRIVE 320 GB (7200 o/min) serial ATA/100 harddisk med16 MB DataBurst™ buffer
VIDEOCARD DOUBLE SLI 256 MB nVidia™ GeForce 8600GTS-grafikkort
It tallies up to around $3.000 dollars with the currency today, but it would be the equivalent of you (an American) paying $1.900.
- Thomas
#2
Posted 01 July 2007 - 09:28 AM
I have the some problems over here. My biggest problem is the videocard. My motherboard doesn't have PCi express. When I look at the specs of your new system I think that you'll fast computer and.. modern.. with all its capabilities... fast ram, fast HD, fast processor. All these things add up, you know. So you'll be in the clear for quit some years an be able to play BF2 with all graphical details set to max! I'm jealous.
Klaas
#3
Posted 01 July 2007 - 09:32 AM
Operating System- Windows Media Center is 32 bit. 32 bit can't use all of your 4 gigs of RAM. Only around 3 will show up and be used properly. If you want to use 4 gigs you need to get a 64 bit operating system. The only XP that is 64 bit is Windows XP Professional 64 bit edition. All forms of Vista are available in 32 bit or 64 bit.
Memory- Good, but DDR800 is more of the gaming standard these days
Hard Drive- Good
Video Card- Personally, I would just get an 8800gts 640mb rather than the duel 8600's.
#4
Posted 01 July 2007 - 09:42 AM
http://www.dansdata....askdan00015.htm
I have that same cpu........ overclocking dream.
If the HDD is the Seagate 7200.10. perpendicular recording,its awesome too. (as long as its not a China build)
How big is the PS? I'm thinking it shouldn't be under 600w.
You actually might be better off with ONE video card. Instead of 2 at 256,IMO,one 8800 GTS at 640 just might give you
better performance. Just a thought.
Do you know what brand of memory or mobo they're using?
Personally,I like building my own,I know thats not everyones cup of tea,but at least you have TOTAL control of the end result
#5
Posted 01 July 2007 - 09:47 AM
#6
Posted 01 July 2007 - 09:50 AM
I could only choose between that one and 2gig of the same brand. So I upgraded it to 4gigs of RAM.Memory- Good, but DDR800 is more of the gaming standard these days
These are my choices though, and it will cost more to choose the first alternative:Video Card- Personally, I would just get an 8800gts 640mb rather than the duel 8600's.
SIMPLE 768 MB nVidia® GeForce® 8800 GTX-videocard
DOUBLE SLI 256 MB nVidia™ GeForce 8600GTS-videocard
This is the part where I am lost. You can choose to build your computer on either a VISTA "platform" or an XP "platform". I have no idea what to choose, so I chose XP. The standard XP version chosen is the Media Center, and it actually costs more to "upgrade" to Windows XP professional, while choosing VISTA doesn't affect the price at all.Operating System- Windows Media Center is 32 bit. 32 bit can't use all of your 4 gigs of RAM. Only around 3 will show up and be used properly. If you want to use 4 gigs you need to get a 64 bit operating system. The only XP that is 64 bit is Windows XP Professional 64 bit edition. All forms of Vista are available in 32 bit or 64 bit.
PS?How big is the PS? I'm thinking it shouldn't be under 600w.
#7
Posted 01 July 2007 - 09:53 AM
#8
Posted 01 July 2007 - 10:10 AM
You can not choose which power supply you want, and it does not say anything about it in the final "summary", so my guess would be that they decide which one it is that is needed and include it.PS= power supply
#9
Posted 01 July 2007 - 10:37 AM
I have that same cpu........ overclocking dream.
Cant OC Dell's
#10
Posted 01 July 2007 - 10:41 AM
try em they might ship to you i dunno
#11
Posted 01 July 2007 - 10:47 AM
if your building this for BF1942, than 8600GTS will work fine. but I doubt you will be able to run the Crysis with 8600 GTS SLI
EDIT: and I would go with Vista for OS, most of XP programs work in it and its the future
#12
Posted 01 July 2007 - 10:54 AM
I am running Vista with 2 gigs of RAM and I have yet to see any game use it all, so like FLash said I would spend less money on memory and more on the video card. Also, you'll be happier with 2GB of DDR800 than with 4GB of DDR667. If Dell isn't giving you the choices you want try looking elsewhere.
Regarding the operating system XP Media center is actually built on top of XP Pro, they just hide most of the features but you can find them if you know where to look (cough Regedit cough). Whether you choose Vista or XP stick with the 32 bit versions, the 64 bit versions are not ready for gaming yet, mostly due to driver availability.
Also, Pest is right, Vista is the future you'll have to upgrade sooner or later to play the latest games.
#13
Posted 01 July 2007 - 11:01 AM
Whether you choose Vista or XP stick with the 32 bit versions, the 64 bit versions are not ready for gaming yet, mostly due to driver availability.
No driver problems here on my 64 bit Vista. Can't speak for ATI, but when Nvidia releases a Vista driver it is in both 32 and 64 bit (and the current 158.45 runs BF2 better than when I was running XP).
#14
Posted 01 July 2007 - 11:38 AM
PROSESSOR Intel® Core™ 2 Duo E6700-prosessor (2,66 GHz, 1066 MHz, 4 MB buffer)
OPERATIVSYSTEM Genuin Windows Vista™ Home Premium - norwegian
MEMORY 2048 MB 667 MHz Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM [2 x 1024]
HARDDIRIVE 320 GB (7200 rpm) seriell ATA-harddisk med 8 MB DataBurst™ buffer
VIDEO CARD 256 MB ATI Radeon® X1300 Pro PCI Express video card
This tallies up to UNDER $2000 with todays currency, and would be the same as an American paying $1100, and I even get a 22" monitor! The processor is has more GHz, it has VISTA, the RAM is the same, only less as suggested here. The only real difference is the video card. So my question is, how is that video card?
#15
Posted 01 July 2007 - 11:47 AM
You can get an 8800gts 320 OC for $280-ish and you would see outstanding performence
Look for an HDD with 16mb cache as that 8mb cache on a SATA 3.0 port is like putting a Ferrari on a dirt road.
Depending on how much more I would go for DDR2 800
Dell, Gateway, Compaq, all those brands take the lowest bid on ALL motherboards and use them for their machines, thus you can often expect a mobo problem from a Major Brand PC (no offense to anyone who uses them)
Often with the customers I have is the power supply from companies like Dell are normally under watted and way less amperage than needed to run the right video card.
#16
Posted 01 July 2007 - 11:48 AM
I went to Dell's site and chose, I don't know what it was, but it was a different alternative, and I came up with this result which is OVER $1000 cheaper!
PROSESSOR Intel® Core™ 2 Duo E6700-prosessor (2,66 GHz, 1066 MHz, 4 MB buffer)
OPERATIVSYSTEM Genuin Windows Vista™ Home Premium - norwegian
MEMORY 2048 MB 667 MHz Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM [2 x 1024]
HARDDIRIVE 320 GB (7200 rpm) seriell ATA-harddisk med 8 MB DataBurst™ buffer
VIDEO CARD 256 MB ATI Radeon® X1300 Pro PCI Express video card
This tallies up to UNDER $2000 with todays currency, and would be the same as an American paying $1100, and I even get a 22" monitor! The processor is has more GHz, it has VISTA, the RAM is the same, only less as suggested here. The only real difference is the video card. So my question is, how is that video card?
X1300 is NOT a gaming card...other than that it looks good.
Edit: Beat me to it uberhaven
#17
Posted 01 July 2007 - 11:52 AM
How about you invest in the best available computer:
Macintosh
Seriously, now with the intel chip, I can do primarily anything Windows does and still keep the superior Macintosh OSX for non gaming related things. And the in game performance (granted you buy the desktop or the tower) is very satisfying.
It is a bit pricey, but Apple has thrown in so much, it's actually a very good value.
The only downside would be having to buy your own copy of XP/Vista to run Boot Camp with.
#18
Posted 01 July 2007 - 11:57 AM
www.ibuypower.com
www.cyberpowerinc.com
It might be a bit more pricey, and you might not want the pretty case, but you get a lot more customization and the motherboard/PSU selection is wider. The only thing I dislike is how NO site allows you to chose third parties for your video card.
#19
Posted 01 July 2007 - 12:04 PM
Ok, scratch the other one I mentioned. How about this alternative?
PROSESSOR Intel® Core™ 2 Duo E6600-prosessor (2,4 GHz, 1066 MHz, 4 MB buffer) (Core, or Core Viiv? Dont know what to choose)
OPERATIVSYSTEM Genuine Windows Vista™ Home Premium - norwegian
MEMORY 2048 MB 667 MHz Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM [2 x 1024]
HARDDRIVE 500 GB seriell ATA RAID 0 stripe [2x250GB 7200 o/min-station with DataBurst™ buffer]
VIDEO CARD SIMPLE 768 MB nVidia® GeForce® 8800 GTX-video card
It costs slightly more than the second alternative I posted, but nothing worth mentioning.
#20
Posted 01 July 2007 - 12:10 PM
With the 8800gtx and the E6600 you can play every game on max for quite sometime.
Those 2x250GB HDD's in RAID-0 make them about the same access speed as a 10k Raptor for a lot more space for a lot cheaper.
You will probably be ok with the DDR2 667 since I guess you won't be over clocking you don't really need the extra mhz's.
Defiantly go with that last choice.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users